Upcoming Events

There are no upcoming events at this time.


Emvpanayv- One who tells the story

Emvpanayv- One who tells the story

'Sound familiar?'

Gary Fife/Radio Specialist

Presidential action, baseball logo, no beer on Oglala border, local battles

OKMULGEE, Okla. — This spring, there was a bit of a flap over the Prez traveling to the home of Andrew Jackson to pay homage to the 9th president of the expanding United States. In March, Trump laid a wreath on Jackson’s grave and gave a hand salute to his statue.

“Old Hickory” had a few nicknames and among them was the phrase “Indian Killer.” In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act resulting in the Trail Of Tears for southeastern tribes.

Some folks have made comparisons between the two. Right after assuming office the Prez has signed bills opposing Native American interests. He and his allies have hinted at privatizing Indian lands, in order to ‘free’ natural resources on reservations and other Indian lands.

Sound familiar?

Out of curiosity (perhaps, somewhat morbid) I once visited the Hermitage, Jackson’s home. After driving up the guitar-shaped driveway, it led to a stately Southern style mansion that had been turned into a museum of Jackson’s life.

During the tour, I asked the girl guide about Jackson’s dealings with Indian tribes. She coughed nervously and said something like Jackson did have many dealings with Indians and proceeded to move on to another part of the mansion.

We have yet to see how the current Prez is going to deal with us, but right now, it doesn’t look good.

Here’s a bit of an update on the Indian mascot issue.

The NBC website sports page reported the commissioner of Major League Baseball has weighed in on the issue. The source said Rob Manfred would have a dialogue with team owner Paul Dolan about the Chief Wahoo caricature.

According to the ‘New York Times,’Baseball, said Manfred, in his talks with the Indians’ owners, had made clear his “desire to transition away from the Chief Wahoo logo. We have specific steps in an identified process and are making progress,’’ Courtney added. “We are confident that a positive resolution will be reached that will be good for the game and the club.’’ ’

Will it happen or won’t it? Diehard defenders of mascot logo did make their views known, sometimes rather profanely, at a group of mascot protesters outside the Cleveland stadium during the April opening day.

On a somewhat related note, the ‘Washington Post’ by way of Indianz.com says the Original Americans Foundation has significantly reduced the amount of money it donates to tribes. The foundation is solely supported by Disneyland-On-The-Potomac R-skins football team owner Dan Snyder.

The amount dropped from $3.7 million to $1.4 million. No word as to why.

The ‘Lincoln (Nebraska) Journal Star’ just reported that the beer stores on the border of the Oglala Sioux reservation will lose their licenses to sell beer.

The town of Whiteclay had been selling millions of cans of beer to the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation residents for years. Local tribal officials and Native activists have been trying to close up the four beer stores for years.

Activists and law enforcement officials have said over the years, the stores were a major source of alcohol related problems for the Lakota people there. The decision brought tears of joy to their faces.

The stores must re-apply for their licenses and are expected to appeal the decision Nebraska Liquor Control Commission, according to the ‘Journal Star.’

Locally, there’s going to be a bit of a battle brewing over Muscogee (Creek) Nation citizenship, election rules and the blood quantum issue. Social media has had more than a few comments about the issue.

Some folks want to lower the blood quantum requirements, some don’t. There are many people concerned, but most don’t want to talk publicly about the issue.

In other local news, there will be a stompdance at the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Festival in June. That event was the focus of a lot of conjecture after a memo from tribal officials earlier this year stating that there would be no stompdances on tribal property.

That’s good news, since the feature of the Festival was one of the high points and a wonderful way to celebration Mvskoke culture.

See ya at the Festival!

1 comment

Latest Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *


Cancel reply






1 Comment

  • paul r. jones

    April 20, 2017, 6:34 pm

    This article is an astonishing piece of a deplorable lack of journalist curiosity regarding U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” since The Indian Citizenship Act of 1924! That single Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, made moot all previous common law-state and federal-including Presidential Executive Orders, Commerce Clause and Treaty Clause alleged Indian Treaties (if any U.S. Senate confirmed Indian treaties actually existed pre-1924 Citizenship) regarding U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” so often touted by politicians and Indian advocates as being legitimate law. It never ceases to amaze me that not one Article III judge adheres to their oath of office to support and defend the Constitution from fraud upon the Court petitions to adjudicate alleged common law-state and federal-that does not exist…that law being Title 25-INDIANS!

    And yet, politicians and MSM continue to perpetuate willful blindness to the Constitutional absurdity that Congress, Presidents/Governors, Initiatives and Referendums can make distinguishable the capacities, metes and boundaries of a select group of U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” post citizenship.

    The United States Constitution makes for no provisions for:

    1. Indian sovereign nations. None of the asserted tribes possess any of the attributes of being a ‘sovereign nation:’ a. No Constitution recognition b. No international recognition c. No fixed borders d. No military e. No currency f. No postal system g. No passports

    2. Treaties with its own constituency

    3. Indian reservations whereby a select group of U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race”
    reside exclusively and to the exclusion of all others, on land-with rare exception-that is owned by the People of the United States according to federal documents readily available on-line that notes rights of renters as ‘occupancy and use’ by these distinguished U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” only with the land owned by the People of the United States.

    4. Recognition of ‘Indian citizenship’ asserted by various tribes. There is no international recognition of “Indian citizenship” as there is no ‘nation’ from which citizenship is derived.

    A simple question for politicians and MSM to answer…a question so simple, it is hard:

    “Where is the proclamation ratified by 1/3rd of the voters of the United States that amends the Constitution to make the health, welfare, safety and benefits of a select group of U.S./State citizens distinguishable because of their “Indian ancestry/race?”


    REPLY