Meeting held on MCN jurisdiction expansion court case

Meeting held on MCN jurisdiction expansion court case
(Native News Today) Muscogee (Creek) Nation Attorney General Kevin Dellinger speaks during a public meeting held Nov. 30 at the MCN Mound building in Okmulgee, Oklahoma by the MCN and Okmulgee County Bar Associations about the Murphy v. Royal case.

Jason Salsman/Multimedia Producer

Attorneys involved in, impacted by Murphy v. Royal give insights

OKMULGEE, Oklahoma — The calls kept coming in.

Phones were lighting up all week at the Muscogee (Creek) Nation Lighthorse Tribal Police headquarters and Office of the Attorney General with citizens asking about the Murphy v. Royal case.

The 1999 murder conviction of Muscogee (Creek) citizen Patrick Murphy was overturned in the U.S. 10th Circuit Court of Appeals Aug. 8, based on the argument that he committed the crime in Indian Country based on the MCN’s 1866 treaty with the federal government.

A stay in the case requested by Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter was granted Nov. 16 so the state can file certiorari petition with the U.S. Supreme Court to review the appellate court ruling.

Previously, explicit MCN tribal territory was commonly only linked to land owned by the Nation or its citizens and held in trust or restricted status with approval by the federal government.

The precedent resulting from the case could broaden this to the entire 11-county tribal jurisdiction, which brings up questions about changes in criminal and civil oversight.

Ghezzi, who serves as co-counsel for Murphy, gave the case history and Dellinger spoke about what is involved with the potential for a transition back to the 1866 jurisdiction status.

Dellinger and Ghezzi both indicated a disagreement with claims made by the state and federal governments regarding concerns over law enforcement resource challenges and caseload issues that could arise.

Among the concerns presented by the Oklahoma and federal justice departments that they deemed unsubstantiated were:

Every state conviction involving tribal citizens within the jurisdiction will be subject to collateral attack in federal court.

The U.S. will be required to investigate and prosecute 1,000 new cases each year.

The increased caseload will fall on a single Eastern District federal judge and that civil rights protection will be inapplicable to many Oklahoma citizens.

“There have been a lot of issues brought up that aren’t supported by data or evidence,” Dellinger said. “The message we wanted to get out to the community is we have the resources, the personnel, the ability to address this issue.”

Dellinger said an outcome in favor of Murphy would require a need to enact government-to-government relations and find a solution that works for all parties moving forward.

He likened the situation to the boom of the gaming industry and how the state and tribes worked together under a new system to create compacts.

“It’s going to take the efforts of a lot of people,” he said. “Other tribes, the state, the feds working together.”

There were questions taken from the audience regarding concerns over individual land status changes, territorial reach and mostly on the tribe’s ability to handle a larger law enforcement responsibility.

“There have been brief conversations at this point about moving forward and increasing our personnel and infrastructure,” Dellinger said. “There are valid concerns about that and the Nation footing that.”

Dellinger said they have also been discussions with the other governments impacted by the case.

“We’re looking outside of the Nation initially to help us make this transition if the Murphy case is upheld and that gives the Nation a little more time to have those conversations about fiscal concerns,” he said.

Dellinger said an executive session was held during an Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes meeting with attorneys present to discuss the matter.

The State of Oklahoma’s petition to the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case is due Feb. 7, 2018.

The Murphy brief in opposition to this petition is due March 9, 2018.

7 comments

Latest Posts

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked with *

Cancel reply

7 Comments

  • […] reinstated MCN reservation is a reference to the reservation status described in the recent Murphy v. Royal 10th Circuit Court of Appeals […]

    REPLY
  • […] (MCN Attorney General) Kevin Dellinger said in the meeting just the other night, law enforcement is like the heart of this decision that’s going to be coming,” LTPD Chief […]

    REPLY
  • […] The tribal town uses that position to maintain that it – along with the other Oklahoma-based tribal towns with federal recognition — has shared jurisdiction over MCN’s eastern Oklahoma reservation, which was reinstated in August as part of the 10th Circuit Court’s ruling in Murphy v. Royal. […]

    REPLY
  • Magister
    January 3, 2018, 10:13 pm

    Certainly, there’s no "reversion back to 1866 jurisdictional boundaries," the MVSKOKE have always possessed these boundaries despite the distractions of modern convention that have blinded many to what is ours.
    Oklahoma has known for years they lack jurisdiction to prosecute certain crimes – and rightfully so – for the less tribes cede in terms of Rights and Sovereignty to others, – the stronger all Natives are.
    We have to make sure any cross-deputization agreements are correctly worded and cognizant of the future of the nation. Law-enforcement on the White side will require the most training and cultural understanding with regard to native approaches to criminal justice.
    For native emergent situations a number like "9-1-1" will need to be secured and used by the tribe and disseminated at gatherings, agencies, and via PSA’s. These notions will take time to be assimilated and the public will not suddenly turn to lawlessness simply because a man succeeded in his appeal.<em>Murphy</em> is a great affirmation of identity and the Creeks will succeed in maintaining their fair share of enforcement responsibility – particularly for those crimes covered under the Major Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. s. 1153, and rightfully so – our people belong where they are rightfully supposed to go once they’re found guilty – not where our historical negligence and the White discrimination has taken them.

    REPLY
  • […] The tribal town uses that position to maintain that it – along with the other Oklahoma-based tribal towns with federal recognition — has shared jurisdiction over MCN’s eastern Oklahoma reservation, which was reinstated in August as part of the 10th Circuit Court’s ruling in Murphy v. Royal. […]

    REPLY